Help Change DSF
I normally stay out of all these debates. I can hardly believe this one is still going on. I notice comments being made that have nothing to do with pin trading. I have never seen so much drama on any site as I do on this one. I came to the forum to have fun, meet new people and pin trade. Instead, I see name calling, people whining because they want a certain pin and they are mad because no one will trade for it. People post sob stories about getting infractions. Hey, if you break the rules, what do you expect? I've seen people practically BEG others to give them pins. Yikes, where is the fun in all this? Sorry, but I had to speak my mind. Maybe this isn't the place for me. I don't mean to offend, I just have a hard time understanding why it has to be this way.
they can't stop people from forming their own lines earlier, because they have no control outside their own property
This may be true, but they also should not honor those unofficial lines.
The cynic in me thinks that they like the hype created by certain releases...because it promotes pin sales generally?
It could be a very valid reason. Hyping for sales. Which plays into my theory that there is some sort of bonus structure based on sales.
Im beginning to think that they know exactly which pins sell the most based on characters. Any suggestions for higher LE sizes were taken and applied to weak characters and moved slowly. Probably to "prove" that higher LE sizes don't work and sales dropped. All in an effort to keep the hype at peak levels and sell all the stock extremely quickly.
Even the pin preview at WDW may have been designed to create hype and amp up sales. Why else show pins when you don't even sell them in that side of the States? To create demand.
Now the question is... Evil genius plan or dumb luck?
Why are you so dead on one per person? That won’t help much. It only means the collectors there will keep the sets for their collection and the resellers and company will still have their market if not more. One per person is a ridiculous idea it only adds to hype and makes people want more since they only can get one trade out of the pin. It’s agreed that edition sized must go up that we all agree with I don’t know if there is a decent argument against it. Wrist bands and all that don’t work all; I don’t see a system that would be fair. Online comes down to whom can move through a site faster, and just limiting the amount you can buy just because more people came after and want the pin is not fair. For now let’s just hope there is a increase in edition size than we can work from there. Who knows maybe if they up the sizes there will be no need to have wristbands and or alternatives.
i know its high but 1000 would make me happy
The cynic in me thinks that they like the hype created by certain releases...because it promotes pin sales generally?
Until they up the edition size, 1 per person is the only way those of us that actually want the pin for our own collections can get them! I actually shop there, I actually collect their pins. I want my 1 set. I don't need a set to trade or sell. If its a release I don't need then I can get them for trade. 1 set is sufficient.
That's just you being selfish, not all or even the majority ends up on the market, even still there get traded around to the ones that want it for there collection, like for me if it's a tangled pin I want it for my tangled collection, than I could use my second tangle to trade for other tangled pins I don't have yet. If it's just one I only move an inch in my collection rather a foot with a trade.Code:
Not everyone in line is a reseller, a few but not the majority.
Question, how is me being happy with 1 set more selfish than you wanting 2 sets??
I know that you are all being passionate about the topic (1 per person vs. 2 per person), but let's be respectful. It's not cool to call someone selfish for advocating the 1 per person rule so that they can get the pin for their personal collection, and then justify the 2 per person rule so you can advance your own personal collection by trading the extra pin. Sounds to me like both of you are advocating based on your own best interests, and there's nothing wrong with that.
I think most agree that the best plan of action for DSF is to increase the LE size, which I hope they are seriously considering. Good luck all.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?