My own relationship with pins is complex (kind of)... While a few odd pins came into my possession before, I really started seriously collecting after my last visit to Disneyland USA in 2012. What prompted it was seeing SO MANY people sporting lanyards... I wanted to join the club
For me, though, it is very much about collecting. I tend to see pins more as a form of cultural affiliation than as a "hobby" as such... I'm overthinking what people wear and why. On the one hand, they serve as mnemonic devices through which we symbolically associate with the things that capture our interest. The clearest example are pins like the Piece of Disney ride and movie history pins... You are literally carrying a scrap of Disneyland or a Disney film with you.
On the other hand, these objects at once identify a person as a serious Disney fan while communicating one's own distinctive interests within that fan community. It's not only an internal association with Disney's creative products, but also an external association with Disney fandom. At once I'm showing off that I'm "one of you" while sharing my own individual identity within that broad community. That in turn opens up dialogue: we're all checking out each other's pins, sharing our love of the different variations within the larger connecting theme of Disney fandom. (This is also why I think Vinylmation will never replace pins... Vinylmation lacks the ability to
show off)
So in that spirit, I maintain two collections: my souvenir collection of pins from parks and tours and other Disney places I've been to, and my thematic collection of 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea/Jules Verne pins. One reminds me of and communicates about my travels, the other associates me with and tells others about my interests. However, because my interests are so
obscure, I resort to having to buy what I want.
Except for a couple pins bought online after the fact because none were available at the time, my souvenir collection was bought on-location because that is kind of the point. Many of my Verne pins were also bought on-location (my Tokyo Disneysea ones even predate when I started actually collecting... originally they were in my souvenir collection), but I've had to purchase the rest. I've only ever successfully traded for one pin, on that 2012 trip to Disneyland.
So I guess in a sense I'm a good example of the transition from a trading ethos to a collecting ethos. I think one of the most conflicted developments in Disney pins are the mystery packs. Personally, as a collector, I object that trying to make people buy things without knowing what they are is an tacky attempt to make money without actually providing anything. It's like they can't sell as many pins honestly anymore, so they're trying to trick people into buying lots of these boxes so they can rack up sales. However, I can also see where all these duplicates floating around and the thrill of the hunt might actually help foster trading activity... At least, it might if not for scrappers. Disney's unwillingness to pursue the issue is problematic for us, because knowing that that you're entering a minefield of counterfeits is daunting to any prospective novice.
Anyways, enough of my prattling on. I think Disney will always
sell pins so long as there is a market for people who want relatively inexpensive ways of identifying with the Disney brand and fan community. What shape pin
trading may take in the future is anyone's guess.