Hallelujah! Trade compare back on Pinpics!
If you think about it, no one else has a database as large as Pinpics. I never paid to upgrade my Pinpics account and I still get everything I need from it. People are spending hours on program changes trying to make the site better. I feel our contributions to the site are not helping them, they are helping all of us who use the site.
OH YAY! Comparing trades to wants was always there, but I missed comparing their wants to my OWNS in case there was something from my collection that I might be willing to let go of for a grail.
Crazy step backwards to get rid of groups. I don't know what they were thinking. The "part of" or whatever it is in the search feature is terrible. There should be a place to add things like hashtags so people can find stuff, and then just create a list of hasthags. Like #ptd, and then you can search that and find them. Something, anything.
This.But it's also true that they purchased something that was built by fans, for fans, to try and make money off of it, and that's why it's the biggest database out there...not because thy created it. There's a lot of people who put a lot of time and effort into that to help fans, for free. It's the reason that there are so many gaps in the pins now...some fans don't want to contribute free labor to a for-profit site.
There's some truth to that. But it's also true that they purchased something that was built by fans, for fans, to try and make money off of it, and that's why it's the biggest database out there...not because thy created it. There's a lot of people who put a lot of time and effort into that to help fans, for free. It's the reason that there are so many gaps in the pins now...some fans don't want to contribute free labor to a for-profit site.
At the end of the day, I think people would have been more accepting of the whole thing if they had built their own database from the ground up, improved on what Pinpics was already offering, then presented the paid tiers.
So far, I haven't seen anything that the old site didn't have (that I would use), with the exception of the pinpoint search (searching WITHIN a member's stuff), which is a great addition and an amazing time saver. But everything else I remember being on the old site.
I'm relieved and grateful they haven't closed it off to non-paying members yet, but I'm not super hopeful that that won't change one day.
It doesn't get me worked up, but I still have opinions on it, I guess.
My biggest issue with adding new pins to the site is that any images or descriptions I provide automatically become copyrighted and *owned* by PinPics. That really bothers me, enough so that I won't post any new pins to the site.
docfish2u said:Where there mistakes made, sure there were. Are they trying to fix them and make as many people as possible happy, again from what I have seen I like the new direction they are going.
I have a hard time understanding why this bothers everyone. It's just a picture. Once I take a picture of a pin, what else am I going to do with it? It helps the pin community. What is wrong with that? I think everyone is so bitter since the old site was shut down that they look for every excuse to hate the new site. I mean no disrespect for people's opinions but how many of you have really truly tried to use the new version of Pinpics?
I have a hard time understanding why this bothers everyone. It's just a picture. Once I take a picture of a pin, what else am I going to do with it?
Actually, my number one issue with Pinpics is that we don't KNOW what's going on with them. Like, if they're that concerned about how bad things have gone, a little "press release" type open letter to the pin community would probably be a good idea. We have no idea what they're up to or where they're coming from. A lot of what I hear is people saying, "I talked to so and so at this convention or event"...you know, secondhand stuff.
By biggest issue that that once I post MY picture, it automatically becomes PINPIC'S picture, and now I have to ask THEM permission to use MY picture!! That is it, in a nutshell...
Regretting starting this thread, tbh. Or at least making the off-the cuff comment towards the end of my post, which seems to have opened the debate once again. We've done this song and dance about Pinpics a million times, I wasn't really looking to re-hash it.
Civil discussion is always a good thing and I have seen this thread be very civil. It never hurts to have a discussion and I did notice you were talking positively about the new additions to the site. I try to avoid the slamming threads as not much is accomplished in those. But since this one was civil I thought I would throw in what I knew and try to clarify some things.
Doc, (and I'm not saying this agressively, fyi) I'm not sure what "fiction" I was laying down that "fact" had to be pulled from it- the new owners did or do (in the future) intend to make money off Pinpics, yes? Were we all lied to about that? That was my understanding. That's pretty much all I said on the subject.
Yes, it's expensive to run...I never implied it wasn't? We used to have fundraisers to help with it. The pay portion is gone? News to me! Is that for good? By that, I mean have they given up on making money on it? Like, that would be a pretty big change in motivation, if it's gone from a business purchase back to a fan site.
You had mentioned that they were still a pay site, they are not. So I took the chance to talk about a few things I know about. I hope you don't think I was going after you personally. I know a lot of people have said a lot of things they have heard good and bad about pinpics. Like every discussion there are 3 sides, party A's, side, party B's side and the truth is usually someplace in the middle. The pin database was always always will be completely free to use, I have heard that from the owner himself. The only thing on the pay side was the price guides and some other bells and whistles that you could choose to pay for or not.
I totally believe that there are new people working on it- I had heard that they had issues with the people they had handed it over to, originally. It's why I made this post...the site is improving, definitely. Pleased to see it.
You and me both!!! I am very hopeful it will continue to get better.
Suzzie, we have to use the new site now...the old site was shut down. And whether or not people would contribute photos to Pinpics from this point on would probably depend on what they intend to do with the site. Like many others, we don't want to provide free labor to a profit making site, especially when the site was built by fans for fans, originally. If Pinpics is moving away from that model and to a different purpose, then that's different.
Again, the database was never part of the pay side of the site. The donated pictures have always been the property of pinpics, but you were free to use them all they asked is you gave them credit.
Actually, my number one issue with Pinpics is that we don't KNOW what's going on with them. Like, if they're that concerned about how bad things have gone, a little "press release" type open letter to the pin community would probably be a good idea. We have no idea what they're up to or where they're coming from. A lot of what I hear is people saying, "I talked to so and so at this convention or event"...you know, secondhand stuff.
Okay, I apologize in advance for what's about to be a long rant here. But you did ask.
Yes, I have been using the new site all along; I'm still using it because it's still currently the most useful pin site out there, and I really like some of the new features.
I'm also still angry at them for some of their actions.
A lot of people were/are.
It's not about the photo itself. It's that they literally destroyed another fan site, as in took legal action and forced the site to be shut down, over photos and text submitted by volunteers.
That action was petty and unnecessary. Since that wasn't a for-profit part of their site, and since the other site was not for-profit either, there was no REASON for them to do it; they weren't losing anything. There was no threat to their site. Whether or not they had the right to-- they may have, I don't know-- it was unnecessary. To me that shows a meanness of spirit that I can't quite reconcile with everything else.
I can't talk to the legal side of this. I am not a lawyer and don't play one on tv. I loved Ethan's site, it was easy to use and I liked the layout. I was thrilled when he did it! But I can also see how pinpics would not be happy since he used a web crawler to take the information directly from pinpics.
(I don't mean to start the legal arguments about it all over again, so please let's not. Whether or not the other site's runner could've legally won that battle is irrelevant; all legal battles take time and money and energy, and if you haven't got those to spare, then you just haven't. Can't get blood from a turnip, as my mother used to say.)
And of course there were the folks who got banned for doing nothing but mistakenly logging into a part of the site they didn't even know how they got to. (Like Judy. Judy! As if there were ever anyone LESS likely to be trying to hack or cause trouble for a site!) Again, that doesn't say "working to make things better for the fans" to me.
So I'm conflicted. I appreciate the ongoing improvements to the site. I have a harder time dismissing their "mistakes" because some of them were actually harmful (a lot of time and money went into the site that was lost) and no, they aren't trying to fix those mistakes. I'd actually appreciate it a great deal if they would try. Reinstating the accounts that were banned unfairly, maybe. Even a public apology would do. At the very least, a public explanation of why they took those actions. Something. It would show some good faith toward the pin community and maybe rebuild some of the trust that they destroyed.
This. It really would be appreciated if they'd open communications.
Not going to happen.Let's hope both sides can get over the past and move forward to make pinpics a top notch site again.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?