• Guest, Help The DPF Community Thrive - Join Our Donation Drive Today!

    We're launching a special DPF Donation Drive to ensure our beloved forum continues to flourish. Your support is vital in helping us cover essential server costs and keep our community running smoothly — This is more than just a donation; it's an investment in the future of our community.

    Join us in this crucial drive and let's ensure our forum remains a vibrant and dynamic place for everyone.

    Please visit the DPF Donation Drive Thread for details and instructions on how you can make your donation today!

My problem with Disney Couples mystery set

Status
Not open for further replies.
My problem with Disney Couples mystery set
While I'm not bothered by Tink and Peter personally, they were not FORMALLY a "couple" so yeah, it's a wee bit of an odd choice. I agree that in their place, Simba and Nala would've been better. The ones I'd rather see than Tink and Peter are...
Simba & Nala
Pocahontas & John Smith
Hercules & Meg
Esmeralda & Phoebus


Also, is anyone else but me a little annoyed that they continually choose to feature Tiana and Naveen in their frog forms? I mean, I get it... they spend the majority of the movie as frogs and are prepared to do so for the rest of their lives but ... there's so few pins of Naveen as a human. I dunno...a pin of Tiana and Naveen in their wedding garb seems like it would've been so much prettier for this set.
Yes please!!! Crossing my fingers for a second version. :x:


And though I'll take Naveen & Tiana however I can get them, I also would have preferred them in human form. :)
 
Tinker bell is that crazy "girl" friend most guys have, they are not a couple but in her head there married with two kids and a dog a d any girl that so much looks at you is dead..... Yup she kray kray
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top