Well, to be fair, it's also frustrating when someone comes on, drops an info bomb, then plants their feet and states that it's all FACT, when really, it's not. A scientist's head would have exploded reading that post. Dan also backpedaled a lot later, then finally said:
"PS where did I say I was the Know All be all of pin trading. I am only giving my opinions"
When he firmly stated he was presenting FACT in the original post.
I have no issues with the content being presented, and agree with a couple of the points he made, but posting observations as
fact in a poorly worded manner is just asking to be argued with (and not in a healthy debate sort of way). As the internet says, "Don't throw a grenade and act surprised when it goes off"
Perhaps making the post more conversational and less confrontational would garner more intelligent point/counterpoint than defensiveness and backtracking. More flies with honey than vinegar and all that jazz...
I confess to being a little shocked at the original post myself, but I resisted in replying, as past internet endeavors have trained in me.
::shrug::