PLEASE HELP. Determining the (Trading) value of a pin
- Messages
- 4,231
- Location
- California
this is very true.I think the same holds true with all value pins. Something to also think about with eBay is this.
I used the example of the Nemo POH (or a lot of other ones too). It was in the stores at DLR for a couple of months, yet, it was selling on a regular basis on eBay for $29.95 (some were even higher) Now this is all while you can still go buy one for $9.95 less discounts at DLR. Of course, the people who are buying these are usually in other states far away and they cant get to the park and they dont have someone to go get it for them. (Unless they were part of the group "Friends of iamdisneydan" (plug).
To us locals, it's still a $9.95 pin less 10 - 20% but to them, it's a $29.95 pin and they are happy to pay it. So even geograpically, it makes a difference. And if you notice, most of the time (not all the time) most of those pins are listed by sellers in So. Cal.
So even the bargin bin pins from DSF you will see online for $20 - $30.00 and they sell, but chances are, you would not trade $30.00 worth of pins for one being a local (just an asumption)
as i mentioned in a post a while back, i listen to a podcast for trading card games, and in one episode they were discussing the ethics of trading, now this may not necessarily directly apply to pins, but it basically went like this:
- In the current legal competition format of Magic: The Gathering there exists a card valued at about $90 (Jace, The Mind Sculptor; non-foil version)
- If a kid buys a pack of cards ($3.99) and say he pulls one of these chase rares out of the pack, but doesnt know (or even care) it's worth so much.
- Said kid needs 1-2 more of a certain card to complete his competitive deck -- that card may be worth $5/ea
- an older trader/player comes along and offers to trade -- he gets the 2-3 cards he needs to complete his deck, and the older guy just wants the Jace (the $90 card)
is this unethical? Both parties get what they want, and it's not like it costed the kid $90 to get that chase rare, it costed him $3.99 for the pack of cards. so, to him, it was an awesome deal -- he gets the $15 or so of singles he was looking for, and all he paid was $3.99. The values of the cards is just "on paper". sure the older guy can go out and make some power trades with the $90 card he just got, but is it really that bad? both people got what they wanted.
now, this probably doesnt apply to pins, because the values of pins dont shoot up very quickly (tends to be a steady increase in value over time as they become harder to find/get), and frankly, many pin traders are pretty rabid when it comes to the release of desirable low-LE pins, so I wouldn't really expect an 8-10 year old to come up on a DA LE100 or LE25-50 or anything of that nature, if one were to be released nowadays.
As dan mentioned the nemo POH pins were routinely selling on ebay for $30 -- yet at the time they were still available at the parks for $10, not even counting discounts of 10-20% or more. Is this taking advantage? If a person is willing to do a trade/pay a named price (even if it's lopsided) so long as both sides are happy with the result, is it unethical, simply because of what the pin is valued at?
I say no; the person is willing and able, after all. we're not committing pin "rape" here (excuse the wording). We're not forcing them to pay $30 for an $8 pin. However, the convenience of getting a pin they want, having it shipped, and arriving at their door without ever having to leave their house...it may be worth the price.